Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

대한신장학회


간행물 검색

현재 페이지 경로
  • HOME
  • 간행물
  • 간행물 검색
논문분류 춘계학술대회 초록집
제목 Efficacy and Safety Profile of Nafamostat in Patients Receiving Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
저자 PHU TRAN
출판정보 2025; 2025(1):
키워드 nafamastat, anticoagulation, CRRT
초록 To compare efficacy and safety profile between nafamostat and other anticoagulation approaches in patients receiving continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) We conducted a systematic review with meta-analysis. We search OvidMedline, Scopus, Embase, Cochrane Library and EBSCO database from inception to Febuart 1st, 2025 for randomized controlled trials (RCT) and non-RCT comparing nafamostat versus other approaches, including non-coagulations, heparin and regional citra anticoagulation. ROB-2 was used to evaluate risk of bias of the included studies. We included 9 nonRCT and 2 RCT in this analysis. Most studies were conducted in South Korea, Japan and China. All 9 nonRCT were retrospective. Regarding Nafamostat's efficacy, meta-analysis of filter life span reveal an improved in lifespan as compared between Nafamostat and No-anticoagulation approach in high-risk bleeding patients, with a mean difference of 2.6 (95%CI -4.1 to 9.3) hours. Notably, data from two RCTs showed significant difference, at 8.14 (95% CI 0.04 to 16.24). Likewise, comparing between Nafamostat and heparin anticoagulation, a significant filter lifespan benefit was found, with a mean difference of 1.44 (95% CI 0.03 to 2.84) hours. However, compared to regional citrate anticoagulation, no significant difference was found, with a mean difference in filter lifespan at -4.63 (95% CI -15.25 to 5.99) hours. Regarding safety profile, bleeding events, rate of blood transfusion and other nafamostat-related adverse event (hyperkalemia, leukopenia, gastrointestinal symptoms) were comparable with other anticoagulation approach. Based on limited evidence with certain risk of bias, nafamostat appeared to have beneficial effect on filter lifespan, especially when compared to no anticoagulation or heparin. Larger trials comparing RCA and nafamostat are guaranteed.
원문(PDF) PDF 원문보기
위로가기