대한신장학회

Skip Navigation: Skip to contents

KOR
ENG
전체메뉴보기

간행물 검색

현재 페이지 경로

HOME
간행물
간행물 검색

논문분류	춘계학술대회 초록집
제목	Comparison of percutaneous versus open surgical techniques for placement of peritoneal dialysis catheter: a single center study
저자	Kei Lim Shin* 1, Bo Min Kim1, Seok Hui Kang1, Gyeongmin Jeong1, Kyu Hyang Cho1, Jong Won Park1, Kyung Woo Yoon1, Jun Young Do1
출판정보	2016; 2016(1):
키워드	catheter, peritoneal dialysis, peritonitis
초록	Background: These were controversies for the choice of method of peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion. We compared the two implantation techniques, percutaneous and open surgical insertion. Methods: This retrospective study included 178 peritoneal dialysis patients. We identified 94 patients who had undergone percutaneous peritoneal catheter placement with a Tenckhoff trocar and 84 patients who had undergone surgical peritoneal catheter placement. Results: Age at the time of peritoneal dialysis catheter placement was 61.1 ± 13.5 years in percutaneous group and 58.6 ± 13.2 years in surgical group (P = 0.215). There were no significant differences in age, sex, underlying diseases of end-stage renal disease, and follow-up duration between the two groups. In percutaneous group, the catheter survival was 94.1% at 1 year and 76.4% at 4 years. In surgical group, the catheter survival was 93.9% at 1 year and 88.5% at 4 years. There was no significant difference in catheter survival between the two groups. In addition, there was no significant difference in catheter-related infection rate between the two groups. Conclusion: We suggest that percutaneous and surgical methods have comparable outcomes in Asian population.
원문(PDF)	PDF 원문보기

목록

위로가기